Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

5-Amino-1MQ MOTS-C Metabolic Stack: Protocol Comparison

Fat Oxidation Focus 50–75mg daily 10mg daily 5-Amino-1MQ oral; MOTS-C subcutaneous Maximize adipocyte NAD+ and AMPK-driven lipolysis Best for body composition studies. Both compounds dose-dependently increase fat oxidation Insulin Sensitivity Focus 30–50mg dai

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Fat Oxidation Focus
  • 50–75mg daily
  • 10mg daily
  • 5-Amino-1MQ oral; MOTS-C subcutaneous
  • Maximize adipocyte NAD+ and AMPK-driven lipolysis
  • Best for body composition studies. Both compounds dose-dependently increase fat oxidation
  • Insulin Sensitivity Focus
  • 30–50mg daily
  • 15mg daily
  • Both compounds daily
  • Improve glucose disposal and reduce hepatic glucose output
  • Best for metabolic syndrome models. MOTS-C dose correlates with GLUT4 translocation
  • Endurance/Mitochondrial Focus
  • 50mg daily
  • 10–15mg daily
  • 5-Amino-1MQ oral; MOTS-C pre-activity
  • Increase mitochondrial biogenesis and exercise capacity
  • Best for performance research. MOTS-C enhances running endurance by 30% in published trials
  • Longevity/NAD+ Restoration
  • 75–100mg daily
  • 5–10mg daily
  • 5-Amino-1MQ oral; MOTS-C 3–5x weekly
  • Restore declining NAD+ and mitochondrial signaling with age
  • Best for aging research. Both compounds decline endogenously with age
More references

Related material