Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

A Quick Comparison of Potential Delivery Systems

Simple Cream/Gel No enhancement; relies on passive diffusion. Simple to prepare. Completely ineffective for large molecules like BPC-157. Zero meaningful absorption. DMSO Solution Acts as a solvent, disrupting the stratum corneum and 'pulling' molecules throug

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Simple Cream/Gel
  • No enhancement; relies on passive diffusion.
  • Simple to prepare.
  • Completely ineffective for large molecules like BPC-157. Zero meaningful absorption.
  • DMSO Solution
  • Acts as a solvent, disrupting the stratum corneum and 'pulling' molecules through.
  • Potentially effective at increasing penetration.
  • Non-selective (pulls impurities too), can cause skin irritation, lacks controlled delivery, research is very limited and debated.
  • Liposomal Cream
  • Encapsulates the peptide in lipid vesicles that merge with the skin barrier.
  • Targeted delivery, protects the peptide from degradation.
  • Requires sophisticated and expensive technology to formulate correctly. Not something that can be done DIY. Stability can be an issue.
  • Microneedle Patches
  • Creates microscopic, painless channels through the stratum corneum.
  • Bypasses the main barrier directly, highly efficient delivery.
  • Still an emerging technology, can be costly, requires specific patch design for the compound.
  • As you can see, the theoretically viable options are complex. They aren't as simple as just buying a cream base and mixing in some peptide powder.
More references

Related material

Comparison

BPC-157 Diarrhea vs Other Causes

Before attributing diarrhea solely to BPC-157, consider these common confounders. Contaminated product. Peptides from unverified sources may contain bacterial endotoxins, residual…

View details →