Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

AOD-9604 Results After 1 Month: Clinical vs Anecdotal Comparison

Body Fat % (DEXA) 1.2–2.8% reduction from baseline Not measured. Users rely on visual assessment DEXA or Bod Pod required for accuracy; calipers introduce 3–5% error margin Scale Weight Change 1.5–3.2 lbs average loss 0–4 lbs reported; high variance due to wat

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Body Fat % (DEXA)
  • 1.2–2.8% reduction from baseline
  • Not measured. Users rely on visual assessment
  • DEXA or Bod Pod required for accuracy; calipers introduce 3–5% error margin
  • Scale Weight Change
  • 1.5–3.2 lbs average loss
  • 0–4 lbs reported; high variance due to water retention
  • Scale weight alone is insufficient. Simultaneous lean mass gain masks fat loss
  • Waist Circumference (cm)
  • 1.1–2.3 cm average reduction
  • 1–3 cm self-reported; measurement inconsistency common
  • Measure at navel, same time daily, empty stomach. Improves reliability
  • Subjective Visual Change
  • Not assessed in trials
  • 60–70% report "tighter midsection" by week 3–4
  • Real but non-quantitative; lighting and posture affect perception
  • Adverse Events
  • Mild injection-site irritation in 12%; no metabolic disruption
  • Occasional headache or fatigue in first week; resolves spontaneously
  • Fragment lacks GH's insulin-resistance effects. Metabolic safety profile is clean
More references

Related material