Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

AOD 9604 vs Other Fat-Loss Peptides

AOD 9604 HGH fragment (beta-3 AR lipolysis) Phase 2b failed Minimal $40-80 Semaglutide GLP-1 agonist FDA-approved (14.9% loss) GI (44% nausea) $199-499 Tirzepatide GLP-1/GIP dual agonist FDA-approved (22.5% loss) GI (31% nausea) $299-499 Tesamorelin GHRH analo

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • AOD 9604
  • HGH fragment (beta-3 AR lipolysis)
  • Phase 2b failed
  • Minimal
  • $40-80
  • Semaglutide
  • GLP-1 agonist
  • FDA-approved (14.9% loss)
  • GI (44% nausea)
  • $199-499
  • Tirzepatide
  • GLP-1/GIP dual agonist
  • FDA-approved (22.5% loss)
  • GI (31% nausea)
  • $299-499
  • Tesamorelin
  • GHRH analog (GH release)
  • FDA-approved (lipodystrophy)
  • Moderate
  • $200-400
  • CJC-1295/Ipamorelin
  • GH secretagogue
  • Limited human data
  • $100-200
  • MOTS-c
  • Mitochondrial peptide
  • Preclinical only
  • Unknown
  • $80-150
  • AOD 9604 is the lowest-cost option with the weakest clinical evidence. Semaglutide and tirzepatide have FDA approval, large RCTs, and proven 15-22% weight loss. For proven pharmaceutical fat loss, GLP-1 drugs are the clear choice. AOD 9604 remains in the research conversation because of its favorable safety profile and low cost.
  • See our best peptides for weight loss guide for a comprehensive comparison.
More references

Related material