Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

BPC-157 for Hamstring Injury Research: Study Type Comparison

Preclinical (Rat Achilles) Surgical transection 10 mcg/kg daily IP Tensile strength at 28 days +47% ultimate load capacity Most controlled evidence. Direct tendon repair mechanism demonstrated Preclinical (Rat Gastrocnemius) Contusion injury 10–200 mcg/kg dail

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Preclinical (Rat Achilles)
  • Surgical transection
  • 10 mcg/kg daily IP
  • Tensile strength at 28 days
  • +47% ultimate load capacity
  • Most controlled evidence. Direct tendon repair mechanism demonstrated
  • Preclinical (Rat Gastrocnemius)
  • Contusion injury
  • 10–200 mcg/kg daily IM
  • Collagen fiber alignment
  • 53% faster Type I collagen deposition
  • Mechanically closest to hamstring strain. Shows dose plateau at 10 mcg/kg
  • Human Off-Label (Case Series)
  • Grade II hamstring strain
  • 250–500 mcg daily subQ
  • Return-to-play timeline
  • Self-reported 30–40% faster RTP
  • No controls, no blinding. Cannot isolate peptide effect from rehab protocol
  • In Vitro (Tenocyte Culture)
  • Hydrogen peroxide oxidative stress
  • 1–10 mcg/mL culture medium
  • Fibroblast migration rate
  • +62% migration speed vs untreated
  • Confirms receptor-level mechanism but lacks tissue-level complexity
More references

Related material