Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

BPC-157 for Neuropathy Research: Study Comparison

Rat sciatic crush injury (2018) 10 mcg/kg daily IP × 28 days Motor function recovery score +38% at day 28 Single-center study, no mechanistic pathway confirmation beyond GAP-43 Strongest evidence for structural regeneration but dose far exceeds human-equivalen

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Rat sciatic crush injury (2018)
  • 10 mcg/kg daily IP × 28 days
  • Motor function recovery score
  • +38% at day 28
  • Single-center study, no mechanistic pathway confirmation beyond GAP-43
  • Strongest evidence for structural regeneration but dose far exceeds human-equivalent scaling
  • Streptozotocin diabetic neuropathy model (2020)
  • 10 mcg/kg daily IP × 21 days
  • Mechanical allodynia threshold
  • +29% pain threshold increase
  • No nerve fiber density improvement. Symptomatic relief only
  • Suggests analgesic effect without addressing underlying axonal loss
  • Oxaliplatin CIPN prevention (2021)
  • 10 mcg/kg daily IP concurrent with chemo
  • Sensory nerve action potential amplitude
  • +18% preservation vs chemo alone
  • Preventive protocol, not post-injury treatment; no recovery data
  • Cannot extrapolate to therapeutic use after neuropathy is established
  • In vitro dorsal root ganglion culture (2019)
  • 1–100 ng/mL in culture medium
  • Neurite outgrowth length
  • +52% at 100 ng/mL
  • Cell culture doesn't replicate in vivo inflammatory environment
  • Confirms direct neurotrophic activity but dosing irrelevant to systemic use
More references

Related material