Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

BPC-157 Studied Scar Healing: Research Model Comparison

Rat Achilles tendon (Zagreb, 2010) Full transection, surgical repair 10 μg/kg IP daily × 14 days Biomechanical load-to-failure testing 72% increase in tensile strength vs controls at day 14 Strong evidence for structural healing. Consistent across multiple Zag

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Rat Achilles tendon (Zagreb, 2010)
  • Full transection, surgical repair
  • 10 μg/kg IP daily × 14 days
  • Biomechanical load-to-failure testing
  • 72% increase in tensile strength vs controls at day 14
  • Strong evidence for structural healing. Consistent across multiple Zagreb studies
  • Mouse excisional wound (Poland, 2017)
  • 6mm full-thickness dorsal wound
  • 1 μg/kg subcutaneous daily × 21 days
  • Wound closure rate, histology
  • 40% faster closure; reduced scar width by 28%
  • Demonstrates dose-response effect. Lower doses still effective
  • Rat burn injury (Croatia, 2018)
  • 3cm² 3rd-degree burn
  • 10 μg/kg IP daily × 28 days
  • Epithelialization rate, collagen ratio (Type I:III)
  • Type I collagen 2.1× higher; reduced hypertrophic scarring
  • Suggests anti-fibrotic mechanism beyond simple acceleration
  • Human chronic ulcer (Serbia, 2019)
  • Non-healing leg ulcers >6 months
  • 0.01% topical cream BID × 12 weeks
  • Wound surface area reduction
  • 67% reduction vs 18% standard care
  • Small sample (n=22) but first human outcome data
More references

Related material