Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 COA Data: Quality Benchmarks Comparison

HPLC Purity ≥98.0% by peak area <95% or purity stated without method Below 98% indicates incomplete purification or degradation; lack of method transparency suggests unreliable testing HPLC Chromatogram Single dominant peak, sharp and symmetrical, baseline fla

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • HPLC Purity
  • ≥98.0% by peak area
  • <95% or purity stated without method
  • Below 98% indicates incomplete purification or degradation; lack of method transparency suggests unreliable testing
  • HPLC Chromatogram
  • Single dominant peak, sharp and symmetrical, baseline flat
  • Multiple peaks >1% area, broad or split main peak, baseline drift
  • Multiple peaks = synthesis impurities; peak broadening = heterogeneity or degradation; baseline issues = column or solvent contamination
  • Molecular Weight (MS)
  • 3367.9 Da ±0.5 Da
  • >1 Da deviation or molecular weight not reported
  • >0.5 Da deviation suggests wrong peptide, incomplete synthesis, or unwanted modification; absence of MS data means identity isn't confirmed
  • Test Date vs Order Date
  • COA dated within 30 days of order
  • COA dated >90 days before order or no date listed
  • Peptides degrade over time even in lyophilised form; old COAs may not reflect current batch quality
  • Batch Number Consistency
  • Batch number on COA matches vial label
  • Batch mismatch or generic COA with no batch number
  • Mismatch means the COA doesn't correspond to your material; generic COAs are often recycled across multiple batches
  • Professional Assessment
  • Full data transparency with raw chromatogram and mass spectrum published
  • Summary data only, no raw analytical output provided
  • Summary-only COAs allow selective reporting; raw data enables independent verification and reveals quality nuances the summary hides
More references

Related material