Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 Dosing: Protocol Comparison

2× weekly 150–200mcg 300–400mcg 30–60 min before sleep Standard muscle growth protocol. Aligns with extended half-life, minimises injection frequency Optimal for most research applications. Balances convenience with sustained GH elevation 3× weekly 100–150mcg

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 2× weekly
  • 150–200mcg
  • 300–400mcg
  • 30–60 min before sleep
  • Standard muscle growth protocol. Aligns with extended half-life, minimises injection frequency
  • Optimal for most research applications. Balances convenience with sustained GH elevation
  • 3× weekly
  • 100–150mcg
  • 300–450mcg
  • Higher-frequency protocol for users prioritising more stable plasma levels
  • Marginal benefit over 2× weekly. Additional injection offers minimal pharmacokinetic advantage given 6–8 day half-life
  • Daily
  • 50–100mcg
  • 350–700mcg
  • Mimics older protocols designed for shorter-acting peptides
  • Not recommended. Daily dosing designed for GHRP-2/GHRP-6, not extended-release CJC-1295; increases cost and injection burden without proportional efficacy gain
  • Single weekly
  • 200–300mcg
  • Ultra-low-frequency protocol for minimal intervention
  • Suboptimal. Single large bolus creates uneven plasma concentration curve; trough levels drop below therapeutic threshold by day 6–7
More references

Related material