Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 no DAC 30s Age Protocol: Dosing Comparison

20s (baseline GH high) 75–100 mcg 3x/week 60–90 min pre-sleep 8 weeks Lower dose amplifies already-strong endogenous pulses; shorter cycles prevent receptor saturation 30s (moderate GH decline) 100–150 mcg 8–12 weeks Standard therapeutic range for pulse amplit

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 20s (baseline GH high)
  • 75–100 mcg
  • 3x/week
  • 60–90 min pre-sleep
  • 8 weeks
  • Lower dose amplifies already-strong endogenous pulses; shorter cycles prevent receptor saturation
  • 30s (moderate GH decline)
  • 100–150 mcg
  • 8–12 weeks
  • Standard therapeutic range for pulse amplitude restoration without overriding natural rhythm
  • 40s (accelerated decline)
  • 150–200 mcg
  • 3–4x/week
  • 12 weeks
  • Higher dose compensates for reduced receptor density; extended cycle addresses sustained GH deficit
  • 50s+ (significant decline)
  • 200 mcg + GHRP stack
  • 4–5x/week
  • 60–90 min pre-sleep + AM dose
  • 12–16 weeks
  • Dual-pathway stimulation (GHRH + GHRP) required to overcome somatostatin dominance and receptor loss
  • Professional Assessment
  • Dose individualisation based on IGF-1 response at week 4 is more predictive of outcomes than age-based dosing alone. Bloodwork-driven titration prevents both underdosing (no measurable benefit) and overdosing (metabolic side effects without additional GH elevation)
More references

Related material