Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC & Ipamorelin: Comparison Table

Primary Mechanism GHRH receptor agonist. Extends GH pulse duration and amplitude Ghrelin receptor agonist (GHS-R1a). Increases GH pulse frequency and intensity Complementary pathways. One extends pulse, one amplifies peak The combination mimics natural pulsati

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Primary Mechanism
  • GHRH receptor agonist. Extends GH pulse duration and amplitude
  • Ghrelin receptor agonist (GHS-R1a). Increases GH pulse frequency and intensity
  • Complementary pathways. One extends pulse, one amplifies peak
  • The combination mimics natural pulsatility better than either alone
  • Half-Life
  • ~30 minutes (clears within 2–4 hours)
  • ~2 hours (clears within 4–6 hours)
  • Both short-acting. Preserves pulsatile pattern
  • Short half-lives prevent receptor desensitization
  • Cortisol Impact
  • Minimal. GHRH pathway doesn't activate HPA axis
  • None. Selective GHS-R1a binding avoids cortisol release
  • No cortisol elevation when dosed correctly
  • This selectivity is why ipamorelin replaced GHRP-2 in most protocols
  • IGF-1 Elevation
  • 20–40% above baseline (monotherapy)
  • 15–30% above baseline (monotherapy)
  • 30–60% above baseline (combination)
  • Combination produces additive, not merely synergistic, IGF-1 response
  • Typical Dosing
  • 100–200 mcg per dose, 1–2x daily
  • Both peptides same dose, same timing
  • Dosing must preserve pulsatility. Continuous administration fails
More references

Related material