Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 no DAC & Ipamorelin Men Over 40: Research Protocol Comparison

Peak GH Release (Fold Increase vs Baseline) 2.1× 3.4× 8.2× Combined protocol produces synergistic GH release significantly exceeding additive effect Plasma IGF-1 Elevation (% Increase) 18–28% 22–35% 40–60% Only the combined protocol achieves sustained IGF-1 le

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Peak GH Release (Fold Increase vs Baseline)
  • 2.1×
  • 3.4×
  • 8.2×
  • Combined protocol produces synergistic GH release significantly exceeding additive effect
  • Plasma IGF-1 Elevation (% Increase)
  • 18–28%
  • 22–35%
  • 40–60%
  • Only the combined protocol achieves sustained IGF-1 levels comparable to low-dose exogenous GH
  • Lean Mass Gain (12–16 weeks)
  • 0.8–1.5 kg
  • 1.0–2.0 kg
  • 1.5–3.0 kg
  • Dual-peptide protocol doubles lean mass accrual relative to monotherapy
  • Visceral Fat Reduction (12–16 weeks)
  • 6–10%
  • 8–12%
  • 12–18%
  • Lipolytic effect scales with total GH exposure; combined protocol produces clinically significant VAT reduction
  • Cortisol/Prolactin Elevation
  • None
  • Ipamorelin's selectivity eliminates the cortisol and prolactin spikes seen with GHRP-2 and GHRP-6
  • Injection Frequency
  • 1–2×/day
  • 2–3×/day
  • CJC-1295 no DAC's extended receptor binding reduces Ipamorelin dosing frequency when combined
More references

Related material