Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC & Ipamorelin: Peptide Comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC (Modified GRF 1-29) 30 minutes 15–20 minutes 90–120 minutes GHRH receptor agonist. Amplifies GH pulse amplitude 1–3x daily Ideal for pulsatile protocols that mimic natural circadian GH secretion without receptor desensitisation Ipamorelin 2 hou

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • CJC-1295 No DAC (Modified GRF 1-29)
  • 30 minutes
  • 15–20 minutes
  • 90–120 minutes
  • GHRH receptor agonist. Amplifies GH pulse amplitude
  • 1–3x daily
  • Ideal for pulsatile protocols that mimic natural circadian GH secretion without receptor desensitisation
  • Ipamorelin
  • 2 hours
  • 30–45 minutes
  • 3–4 hours
  • Ghrelin receptor agonist. Extends GH pulse duration without cortisol/ACTH release
  • Clean GH release with minimal off-target effects; synergises with GHRH analogues for peak amplitude + duration
  • CJC-1295 With DAC
  • 6–8 days
  • 24–48 hours
  • 7–14 days
  • GHRH receptor agonist with albumin binding. Creates sustained elevation
  • 1x weekly
  • Long half-life risks receptor desensitisation and suppression of endogenous pulsatile GH secretion over time
  • GHRP-2
  • 20–30 minutes
  • 15–30 minutes
  • 60–90 minutes
  • Ghrelin receptor agonist. Strong GH release with mild cortisol/prolactin elevation
  • 2–3x daily
  • Potent but less selective than ipamorelin; useful in research models requiring robust GH stimulation
  • MK-677 (Ibutamoren)
  • 24 hours
  • 24+ hours
  • Oral ghrelin mimetic. Sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation
  • 1x daily
  • Elevates baseline GH between injected pulses; pairs well with short-acting peptides for hybrid protocols
More references

Related material