Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC & Ipamorelin: Peptide Concentration Comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC 2mg 1mL 2000mcg/mL 100–500mcg 0.1mL Standard reconstitution for most protocols. Yields injection volumes in the 0.1–0.25mL range for typical dosing 5mg 2mL 2500mcg/mL 0.08mL Common but suboptimal. Doses below 250mcg fall under 0.1mL precision f

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • CJC-1295 No DAC
  • 2mg
  • 1mL
  • 2000mcg/mL
  • 100–500mcg
  • 0.1mL
  • Standard reconstitution for most protocols. Yields injection volumes in the 0.1–0.25mL range for typical dosing
  • 5mg
  • 2mL
  • 2500mcg/mL
  • 0.08mL
  • Common but suboptimal. Doses below 250mcg fall under 0.1mL precision floor; use 3mL reconstitution instead
  • Ipamorelin
  • 200–300mcg
  • Most versatile for combination protocols. 1:1 volume ratio with CJC-1295 simplifies dual-peptide dosing
  • Same issue as CJC-1295 at this concentration. Increase to 3mL for better syringe precision at typical doses
  • 3mL
  • 1667mcg/mL
  • 0.12mL
  • Optimal for protocols requiring doses below 250mcg. All target doses fall within 0.12–0.3mL injection volume range
  • Best concentration for reproducibility. Injection volumes stay above precision floor across the entire dose range
More references

Related material