Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 no DAC Ipamorelin Stack: Protocol Comparison

Research protocols for the CJC-1295 no DAC Ipamorelin stack vary based on study duration, endpoint measurements, and subject characteristics. The table below compares three standard approaches. Standard Pulsatile 2× daily (morning + evening) 100-150mcg each Up

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Research protocols for the CJC-1295 no DAC Ipamorelin stack vary based on study duration, endpoint measurements, and subject characteristics. The table below compares three standard approaches.
  • Standard Pulsatile
  • 2× daily (morning + evening)
  • 100-150mcg each
  • Upon waking (fasted) + 2-3h post-dinner
  • 8-16 weeks
  • Best balance of convenience and efficacy for most research models; maintains physiological pulse patterns without requiring midday administration
  • Intensive Pulsatile
  • 3× daily (morning + midday + evening)
  • 100-200mcg each
  • Upon waking + post-training or 1400h + pre-sleep
  • 6-12 weeks
  • Maximizes pulse frequency and total daily growth hormone secretion; requires strict schedule adherence and increases injection burden
  • Conservative Entry
  • 1× daily (evening only)
  • 50-100mcg each (escalating to 100-150mcg)
  • Pre-sleep (fasted, 2-3h post-meal)
  • 4-8 weeks initial, then transition to 2× daily
  • Appropriate for initial tolerance assessment or dose-response studies; sacrifices significant synergistic benefit compared to multi-dose protocols
More references

Related material