Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Comparison of CJC-1295 Variants and Metabolic Profiles

Native GHRH (1-29) 6–8 minutes None DPP-4 degradation + renal filtration Continuous infusion or multiple daily Pulsatile (short-lived) Modified GRF (1-29) / CJC-1295 no DAC 30–60 minutes DPP-4 resistant but rapid renal clearance 2–3 times daily Pulsatile (ampl

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Native GHRH (1-29)
  • 6–8 minutes
  • None
  • DPP-4 degradation + renal filtration
  • Continuous infusion or multiple daily
  • Pulsatile (short-lived)
  • Modified GRF (1-29) / CJC-1295 no DAC
  • 30–60 minutes
  • DPP-4 resistant but rapid renal clearance
  • 2–3 times daily
  • Pulsatile (amplified but brief)
  • CJC-1295 with DAC
  • 5–7 days
  • Covalent (via MPA linker)
  • Slow dissociation → renal (60%) + hepatic (40%)
  • Twice weekly
  • Pulsatile (sustained amplitude increase)
  • CJC-1295 in renal impairment (eGFR <60)
  • 8–10 days
  • Reduced renal clearance shifts burden to hepatic
  • Once weekly or extended interval
  • Pulsatile (risk of accumulation)
  • CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin
  • 5–7 days (CJC) / 2 hours (Ipamorelin)
  • CJC binds; Ipamorelin does not
  • CJC as above; Ipamorelin cleared renally within 4–6 hours
  • CJC twice weekly + Ipamorelin daily or BID
  • Synergistic pulse amplification
More references

Related material