Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Cost Comparison: Real Numbers

Cost is a significant factor, and the range spans two orders of magnitude depending on the source. Egrifta SV (brand tesamorelin) ~$3,085/month Prescription required; insurance may cover for HIV indication Compounded tesamorelin $150-300/month Compounding phar

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Cost is a significant factor, and the range spans two orders of magnitude depending on the source.
  • Egrifta SV (brand tesamorelin)
  • ~$3,085/month
  • Prescription required; insurance may cover for HIV indication
  • Compounded tesamorelin
  • $150-300/month
  • Compounding pharmacy; prescription required
  • CJC-1295 with DAC
  • Research compound; compounding pharmacy
  • CJC-1295 no DAC
  • $100-200/month
  • Add ipamorelin cost ($100-200) for combination
  • Brand Egrifta SV is prohibitively expensive for most non-HIV patients. Compounded tesamorelin costs roughly the same as compounded CJC-1295. The cost advantage of CJC-1295 no-DAC disappears when adding ipamorelin, which is the standard combination.
  • For budget-conscious users, the decision between compounded tesamorelin and CJC-1295 with DAC is roughly equivalent in price. The decision then shifts to evidence quality (tesamorelin) versus dosing convenience (CJC-1295 DAC weekly injections).
More references

Related material

Comparison

Limitations of This Comparison

Several structural limitations constrain any honest reading of the tesamorelin–CJC-1295 literature: Asymmetric evidence base. One compound has multiple Phase 3 RCTs and regulatory…

View details →