Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Direct Head-to-Head Comparisons: CJC-1295 No DAC vs Modified GRF(1-29)

Plasma Half-Life 5–7 days (terminal phase) 30–120 minutes Measured via LC-MS/MS in human plasma post-injection Reduced dosing frequency: 2–3×/week vs daily Peak GH Response 10–14 ng/mL at 30–60 min 6–9 ng/mL at 15–30 min Single 100 mcg SC dose in healthy adult

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Plasma Half-Life
  • 5–7 days (terminal phase)
  • 30–120 minutes
  • Measured via LC-MS/MS in human plasma post-injection
  • Reduced dosing frequency: 2–3×/week vs daily
  • Peak GH Response
  • 10–14 ng/mL at 30–60 min
  • 6–9 ng/mL at 15–30 min
  • Single 100 mcg SC dose in healthy adults
  • Higher initial amplitude with CJC-1295 No DAC
  • Duration Above Baseline
  • 5–6 days (>3 ng/mL)
  • 90–120 minutes (>3 ng/mL)
  • Serial GH sampling every 20 min for 8 hours, daily thereafter
  • Sustained pulsatile secretion vs acute spike
  • IGF-1 Elevation (7-day AUC)
  • +180 ng·day/mL mean
  • +45 ng·day/mL mean
  • Serum IGF-1 measured daily × 7 days post-dose
  • 4× greater cumulative anabolic signaling
  • DPP-4 Resistance
  • >95% intact at 4 hours
  • 60–70% intact at 4 hours
  • In vitro human plasma stability assay
  • Greater functional stability in circulation
  • Professional Assessment
  • Preferred for multi-day pulsatile protocols where reduced injection frequency and sustained GH pulses are prioritized
  • Optimal for acute studies requiring tight temporal control of GH peaks and rapid washout between trials
More references

Related material