Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Lyme Disease Researchers Researching BPC-157: Comparison of Approaches

Johns Hopkins (2024–2026) Randomized placebo-controlled, n=60 Change in FSS score at 12 weeks 500mcg SC daily 32% reduction in fatigue vs 11% placebo First trial to demonstrate statistically significant symptom improvement in PTLDS with peptide therapy Stanfor

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Johns Hopkins (2024–2026)
  • Randomized placebo-controlled, n=60
  • Change in FSS score at 12 weeks
  • 500mcg SC daily
  • 32% reduction in fatigue vs 11% placebo
  • First trial to demonstrate statistically significant symptom improvement in PTLDS with peptide therapy
  • Stanford (2025–2027)
  • Open-label dose-escalation, n=40
  • Safety and inflammatory marker reduction
  • 250–1000mcg SC twice daily
  • No serious adverse events at any dose; IL-6 reduced 28% at 500mcg dose
  • Established safety ceiling and identified optimal anti-inflammatory dose
  • Tufts Medical Center (2024–2026)
  • Crossover design, n=30
  • Cognitive function battery scores
  • 500mcg SC daily for 8 weeks
  • Digit Symbol Substitution improved 19% vs baseline
  • First cognitive-focused endpoint in PTLDS peptide research
  • University of Pennsylvania (2025–2027)
  • Observational cohort, n=80
  • Longitudinal symptom tracking
  • Patient-directed (200–600mcg daily)
  • Wide dosing variance; symptom improvement correlated with baseline CRP level
  • Real-world data suggesting peptide efficacy depends on inflammatory phenotype
More references

Related material