Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Mechanistic Comparison Summary

Primary receptor No identified receptor; FAK intracellular activation FPR2; EGFR (transactivation); CXCR2/4 Primary wound biology Angiogenesis; fibroblast migration; collagen synthesis Re-epithelialisation; antimicrobial; neutrophil/monocyte recruitment Fibrob

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Primary receptor
  • No identified receptor; FAK intracellular activation
  • FPR2; EGFR (transactivation); CXCR2/4
  • Primary wound biology
  • Angiogenesis; fibroblast migration; collagen synthesis
  • Re-epithelialisation; antimicrobial; neutrophil/monocyte recruitment
  • Fibroblast migration
  • 22 µm/h (superior)
  • 12 µm/h (moderate)
  • Keratinocyte closure
  • 11 µm/h (moderate)
  • 18 µm/h (superior)
  • Angiogenesis (CD31+)
  • +113% above vehicle (superior)
  • +50% above vehicle
  • Direct antimicrobial
  • None
  • S. aureus −82–88%; MRSA −72–78%; biofilm −58–64%
  • db/db wound closure day14
  • 68%
  • 74%
  • Combination closure day14
  • 88% (additive via orthogonal mechanisms)
  • Key blocker
  • PF-573228 (FAK); L-NAME (eNOS)
  • WRW4 (FPR2); erlotinib (EGFR)
  • Optimal use case
  • Non-infected chronic wound; tendon/ligament; systemic tissue repair
  • Infected wound; biofilm; re-epithelialisation; post-debridement coverage
  • Sequential protocol
  • LL-37 days 0–5 (antimicrobial clearance) → BPC-157 days 5–21 (granulation/angiogenesis)
  • 🇬🇧 UK Research Peptides: PeptidesLab UK supplies COA-verified BPC-157 and LL-37 for research and laboratory use. View UK stock →
  • William is a research analyst at Peptides Lab UK, specialising in research peptides, laboratory compounds, and sourcing standards for high-purity peptide products.
More references

Related material