Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MK-677 Bone Density Research: Protocol Comparison

Elderly hip fracture patients (Murphy 2006) 25mg daily × 24 months +72% at 12 months Osteocalcin +90% at 12 months No significant femoral neck BMD change at 12 months; trend toward improvement at 24 months Biochemical activation confirmed but insufficient dura

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Elderly hip fracture patients (Murphy 2006)
  • 25mg daily × 24 months
  • +72% at 12 months
  • Osteocalcin +90% at 12 months
  • No significant femoral neck BMD change at 12 months; trend toward improvement at 24 months
  • Biochemical activation confirmed but insufficient duration to produce clinically meaningful density gains in compromised bone tissue
  • Healthy elderly men/women (Chapman 1997)
  • 25mg daily × 12 months
  • +60% sustained
  • Osteocalcin +55% by week 4
  • Lumbar spine BMD +1.8% vs placebo
  • Modest density gain in healthy elderly suggests preventive rather than therapeutic application
  • Postmenopausal women (Svensson 1998)
  • 25mg daily × 6 months
  • +39% at 6 months
  • Bone-specific ALP +40%
  • No DEXA measurement performed
  • Short duration limits conclusions. Marker response without density follow-up
  • Growth hormone-deficient adults (Svensson 2004)
  • 25mg daily × 52 weeks
  • +88% peak at 8 weeks
  • Osteocalcin +62% sustained
  • Whole-body BMD +0.9% (not statistically significant)
  • Largest IGF-1 response in deficient population but still minimal density gain. Suggests other limiting factors
More references

Related material