Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MK-677 Dosing, Recovery, and Research Protocol Comparison

10mg daily 40–50% Moderate sleep quality improvement, minimal appetite surge Low. Rare glucose elevation Initial research protocols, older populations 25mg daily 60–90% Significant IGF-1 elevation, marked sleep architecture improvement, accelerated nitrogen re

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 10mg daily
  • 40–50%
  • Moderate sleep quality improvement, minimal appetite surge
  • Low. Rare glucose elevation
  • Initial research protocols, older populations
  • 25mg daily
  • 60–90%
  • Significant IGF-1 elevation, marked sleep architecture improvement, accelerated nitrogen retention
  • Moderate. Appetite surge 90 min post-dose, possible mild water retention
  • Standard research dose for recovery studies, training-adapted populations
  • 50mg daily
  • 70–100%
  • No additional IGF-1benefit vs 25mg
  • High. Fasting glucose elevation in 30% of subjects, pronounced edema
  • Rarely justified. Side effects outweigh marginal gains
  • Evening timing
  • N/A
  • Aligns GH pulse with slow-wave sleep, appetite surge during final meal window
  • Improved tolerability vs morning dosing
  • Preferred for recovery-focused protocols
  • Professional Assessment
  • 25mg daily dosed in the evening is the most evidence-supported protocol. Higher doses don't meaningfully improve outcomes and lower doses underperform in training-adapted populations.
More references

Related material