Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MK-677 Sleep Quality Research: Clinical Trial Comparison

Copinschi et al. 1997 (JCEM) 25mg daily 7 nights +20% duration, +50% density +8% duration First demonstration of REM architecture modification in healthy young men Chapman et al. 1996 (JCE&M) 2 weeks +18% duration +35% consolidation Showed dose-dependent GH pu

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Copinschi et al. 1997 (JCEM)
  • 25mg daily
  • 7 nights
  • +20% duration, +50% density
  • +8% duration
  • First demonstration of REM architecture modification in healthy young men
  • Chapman et al. 1996 (JCE&M)
  • 2 weeks
  • +18% duration
  • +35% consolidation
  • Showed dose-dependent GH pulsatility correlation with SWS depth
  • Svensson et al. 1998
  • 12.5mg daily
  • 14 days
  • +12% duration
  • +22% duration
  • Lower dose still effective; fewer appetite side effects
  • Nass et al. 2008
  • 4 weeks
  • +25% duration
  • +30% duration
  • Demonstrated sustained benefit without tolerance at 28 days
  • Professional Assessment
  • 12.5–25mg evening dosing produces reproducible sleep architecture improvements within 7–14 days. Higher doses accelerate onset but increase transient appetite stimulation. No tolerance observed in trials extending to 90 days.
More references

Related material