Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MOTS-c Anti-Aging Protocol Dosage Timing: Comparison of Administration Schedules

3× weekly (M/W/F) 15–30mg total Morning fasted, 30–60 min post-waking High. Matches natural AMPK rhythm Low. Simple pattern Optimal balance of efficacy and practicality; most research protocols use this schedule Every other day (3.5×/week) 17.5–35mg total Morn

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 3× weekly (M/W/F)
  • 15–30mg total
  • Morning fasted, 30–60 min post-waking
  • High. Matches natural AMPK rhythm
  • Low. Simple pattern
  • Optimal balance of efficacy and practicality; most research protocols use this schedule
  • Every other day (3.5×/week)
  • 17.5–35mg total
  • Morning fasted, rotating days
  • High. Maintains circadian consistency
  • Moderate. Requires calendar tracking
  • Slightly higher weekly exposure; useful for advanced protocols seeking maximal signaling
  • 2× weekly (widely spaced)
  • 10–20mg total
  • Morning fasted, 72–96 hours apart
  • Moderate. Longer gaps between signals
  • Very low. Easy to remember
  • Minimum viable frequency; suitable for maintenance phases after initial adaptation period
  • Daily microdosing
  • 14–35mg total
  • Morning fasted, daily
  • High. Daily circadian reset
  • High. Requires daily commitment
  • Not recommended. Doesn't allow metabolic recovery between doses; produces receptor fatigue
  • Random timing (control)
  • Variable
  • No timing protocol
  • None. Circadian desynchronization
  • N/A
  • Ineffective. Research shows 40–60% reduction in metabolic markers vs timed protocols
More references

Related material