Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MOTS-c Bioavailability: Delivery Method Comparison

Subcutaneous Injection 95–98% 90–120 minutes Minimal (bypasses gut and liver) Requires sterile technique, needle handling, site rotation Highest bioavailability and most reproducible plasma levels. Reference standard for dosing precision Nasal Spray 40–60% 20–

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Subcutaneous Injection
  • 95–98%
  • 90–120 minutes
  • Minimal (bypasses gut and liver)
  • Requires sterile technique, needle handling, site rotation
  • Highest bioavailability and most reproducible plasma levels. Reference standard for dosing precision
  • Nasal Spray
  • 40–60%
  • 20–30 minutes
  • Mucosal enzymes, mucociliary clearance
  • Non-invasive, excipient-dependent, affected by nasal congestion
  • Moderate bioavailability with convenience trade-off. Formulation quality significantly impacts absorption
  • Oral (capsule/tablet)
  • <5%
  • Not applicable (minimal absorption)
  • Gastric acid, pepsin, intestinal peptidases
  • Easiest administration but ineffective delivery
  • Clinically non-viable. Enzymatic degradation prevents systemic absorption
  • Intravenous Bolus
  • 100%
  • Immediate
  • None (direct systemic entry)
  • Impractical for routine use, requires medical setting
  • Maximum bioavailability but logistically unsuitable for most research protocols
More references

Related material