Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MOTS-c for Cyclists: Performance Comparison

VO2 Max Improvement (8 weeks) +8–12% +4–6% Increased mitochondrial density via PGC-1α upregulation Meaningful aerobic capacity gain. MOTS-c amplifies training stimulus Lactate Threshold Power (watts) +15–20W +8–10W Enhanced fat oxidation spares glycogen, delay

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • VO2 Max Improvement (8 weeks)
  • +8–12%
  • +4–6%
  • Increased mitochondrial density via PGC-1α upregulation
  • Meaningful aerobic capacity gain. MOTS-c amplifies training stimulus
  • Lactate Threshold Power (watts)
  • +15–20W
  • +8–10W
  • Enhanced fat oxidation spares glycogen, delays lactate accumulation
  • Threshold gains translate directly to sustained climbing and TT performance
  • Recovery Time (post-threshold session)
  • 36–42 hours
  • 48–60 hours
  • Reduced oxidative stress and accelerated mitochondrial repair
  • Faster recovery enables higher weekly training load without overreaching
  • Time-to-Exhaustion at Threshold
  • +18–25%
  • Improved substrate efficiency and ATP production per O2 consumed
  • Endurance at race pace improves. Critical for breakaway efforts
  • Regulatory Status (WADA)
  • Prohibited (S0, S4)
  • N/A
  • AMPK activation = metabolic modulator
  • Competitive cyclists face sanctions risk. Non-tested athletes unrestricted
More references

Related material