Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MOTS-c Results After 1 Month: Comparison

Fasting Glucose No change to 2–4 mg/dL reduction 3–7 mg/dL reduction 8–15 mg/dL reduction in insulin-resistant populations Earliest detectable metabolic shift. Reliable signal if baseline glucose >95 mg/dL Fasting Insulin Minimal change 8–12% reduction 18–25%

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Fasting Glucose
  • No change to 2–4 mg/dL reduction
  • 3–7 mg/dL reduction
  • 8–15 mg/dL reduction in insulin-resistant populations
  • Earliest detectable metabolic shift. Reliable signal if baseline glucose >95 mg/dL
  • Fasting Insulin
  • Minimal change
  • 8–12% reduction
  • 18–25% reduction
  • Leading indicator of improved insulin sensitivity. More sensitive than glucose alone
  • Subjective Energy
  • Variable. 20–30% report mild improvement
  • 40–60% report noticeable improvement
  • Sustained improvement in 65–75%
  • Heavily influenced by sleep quality, stress, and baseline mitochondrial function
  • Fat Loss
  • Not measurable
  • 0.5–1.5 lbs (overlaps with dietary noise)
  • 3–6 lbs in sustained deficit with training
  • MOTS-c accelerates fat oxidation. Doesn't create the deficit required for loss
  • Endurance Performance
  • No measurable change
  • 3–7% improvement in sustained aerobic output
  • 10–15% improvement vs baseline
  • Gains depend on training stimulus. Sedentary users see minimal performance change
  • Inflammatory Markers (hs-CRP)
  • Minimal
  • 10–20% reduction if baseline elevated
  • 20–35% reduction
  • Anti-inflammatory effects strengthen with duration. Early changes inconsistent
More references

Related material