Source comparison
NAD+ Injection Sites Best Locations: Site Comparison
Before choosing your primary rotation sites, understand how each anatomical zone performs across the metrics that matter for long-term protocol success. Lower Abdomen (lateral) 1.0–2.0 cm Easy Low High (30% faster than thigh) 4 distinct sites Best overall choi
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- Before choosing your primary rotation sites, understand how each anatomical zone performs across the metrics that matter for long-term protocol success.
- Lower Abdomen (lateral)
- 1.0–2.0 cm
- Easy
- Low
- High (30% faster than thigh)
- 4 distinct sites
- Best overall choice for daily protocols. High vascularity, easy self-access, sufficient tissue depth for volume up to 1 mL
- Lateral Thigh (anterior-lateral)
- 0.8–1.5 cm
- Moderate
- Second-best option. Slightly slower absorption but excellent for those with minimal abdominal subcutaneous tissue
- Upper Arm (triceps)
- 0.5–1.0 cm
- Difficult (requires assistance)
- Moderate to High
- 2 distinct sites
- Viable for low-volume injections (<0.5 mL) but difficult to self-administer and limited rotation capacity
- Upper Outer Glutes
- 1.5–2.5 cm
- Moderate (requires mirror or assistance)
- Low to Moderate
- Deepest subcutaneous layer but slowest absorption. Reserve for larger volumes (>1 mL) when other sites are recovering
- The bottom line: most researchers should build their primary rotation around 4 abdominal sites and 4 thigh sites, reserving glutes and upper arms as secondary zones when the primary 8 sites need extended recovery time.