Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Peptide Comparison: GHRH & GHRP Analogues

Peptide Class GHRH Analogue GHRP Half-Life ~8 Days ~30 Minutes ~2 Hours ~30-60 Minutes Mechanism Sustained GH Bleed Short, Sharp GH Pulse Selective GH Pulse Potent GH Pulse Cortisol Impact None Mild Increase Mild/Moderate Increase Prolactin Impact Appetite Imp

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Peptide Class
  • GHRH Analogue
  • GHRP
  • Half-Life
  • ~8 Days
  • ~30 Minutes
  • ~2 Hours
  • ~30-60 Minutes
  • Mechanism
  • Sustained GH Bleed
  • Short, Sharp GH Pulse
  • Selective GH Pulse
  • Potent GH Pulse
  • Cortisol Impact
  • None
  • Mild Increase
  • Mild/Moderate Increase
  • Prolactin Impact
  • Appetite Impact
  • Significant Increase
  • Primary Use Case
  • Foundational, long-term elevation of GH/IGF-1
  • Pulsing in synergy with a GHRP
  • Precision GH pulsing without side effects
  • Maximum strength GH pulsing
  • Strong GH pulsing with appetite stimulation
  • This table really clarifies the 'why' behind the combination. You use CJC-1295 with DAC as the long-acting base and then layer the short-acting GHRPs on top to create powerful, targeted pulses against that elevated baseline. It's a sophisticated, multi-pronged strategy.
More references

Related material