Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Reading the Numbers Honestly: The Full Comparison

With the evidence caveats in place, the attribute-by-attribute comparison below summarizes the documented facts for each peptide. Every cell reflects the cited sources; where something is not established, the table says so rather than guessing. Class Stabilize

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • With the evidence caveats in place, the attribute-by-attribute comparison below summarizes the documented facts for each peptide. Every cell reflects the cited sources; where something is not established, the table says so rather than guessing.
  • Class
  • Stabilized synthetic GHRH(1–44) analog (trans-3-hexenoyl group resists DPP-4 cleavage)
  • Synthetic GHRH(1–29) — shortest N-terminal fragment with full activity
  • Mechanism
  • GHRH-receptor agonist → pulsatile endogenous GH release → ↑ IGF-1
  • Primary studied use
  • Reduction of excess visceral fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy
  • Diagnostic GH-secretion test; pediatric idiopathic GH deficiency
  • Highest evidence tier
  • FDA-approved + multiple Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs[1][2]
  • Human but older/limited; mainly pediatric GHD; no modern adult RCT[5]
  • Typical route
  • Subcutaneous injection, once daily
  • Subcutaneous (treatment) or intravenous (single-dose diagnostic)
  • Half-life
  • ~18 min (single dose); ~37 min (multiple doses)[9]
  • ~10–20 min in humans[6]
  • Reference dosing (research settings only)
  • Clinical label: 2 mg SC daily (HIV lipodystrophy)
  • Historic clinical: ~30 µg/kg/day SC (pediatric GHD); 1 µg/kg IV diagnostic
  • FDA status
  • Approved 2010 (Egrifta) — the only GHRH analog with a current indication
  • Approved 1997 (Geref); withdrawn 2008 for commercial (not safety/efficacy) reasons; no current approved product[10]
  • Sport status
  • WADA-prohibited (GHRH analog)[8]
  • Direct head-to-head trial
  • None — no published RCT compares the two
More references

Related material

Comparison

Limitations of This Comparison

Even the well-supported parts of this reference carry limitations that a careful reader should keep in view. Population specificity. Tesamorelin’s strong data come entirely from p…

View details →