Source comparison
Signs CJC-1295 Gone Bad Degraded: Research Peptide Comparison
CJC-1295 (with DAC) Oxidation of methionine residues, thermal denaturation above 25°C 24–36 months 28–35 days Cloudiness, yellow discoloration, particulates, loss of vacuum seal pH shift below 5.0, viscosity increase, incomplete reconstitution DAC modification
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- CJC-1295 (with DAC)
- Oxidation of methionine residues, thermal denaturation above 25°C
- 24–36 months
- 28–35 days
- Cloudiness, yellow discoloration, particulates, loss of vacuum seal
- pH shift below 5.0, viscosity increase, incomplete reconstitution
- DAC modification increases stability vs unmodified GHRH but remains highly sensitive to temperature cycling. Single-use aliquoting essential
- CJC-1295 (no DAC)
- Rapid enzymatic degradation in solution, oxidation
- 18–24 months
- 7–14 days
- Same as DAC version but faster onset
- Same plus rapid pH drop in reconstituted form
- Shorter half-life means degradation timeline is compressed. Use within one week of reconstitution
- MK 677 (Ibutamoren)
- Hydrolysis in acidic solutions, minimal oxidative stress
- 36+ months
- 60–90 days (higher stability)
- Crystallization at low pH, slight color shift
- Bitter taste intensifies if degraded
- Non-peptide ghrelin mimetic. More chemically stable than peptide-based GH secretagogues like CJC-1295
- GHRP 2
- Aggregation, oxidation
- 24 months
- 21–28 days
- Cloudiness, precipitate formation
- Reduced solubility, viscosity increase
- Shorter peptide chain vs CJC-1295. Aggregation occurs faster once reconstituted