Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

SS-31 Dosage for Exercise Performance: Protocol Comparison

0.1 mg/kg 90 minutes Time to exhaustion +3.2% (not significant) Sedentary adults Insufficient dose for measurable mitochondrial protection during exercise 0.25 mg/kg 60 minutes VO2 efficiency at submaximal load +4.8% (p < 0.05) Recreationally active Minimal ef

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 0.1 mg/kg
  • 90 minutes
  • Time to exhaustion
  • +3.2% (not significant)
  • Sedentary adults
  • Insufficient dose for measurable mitochondrial protection during exercise
  • 0.25 mg/kg
  • 60 minutes
  • VO2 efficiency at submaximal load
  • +4.8% (p < 0.05)
  • Recreationally active
  • Minimal effective dose. Benefit emerges only in sustained moderate-intensity work
  • 0.4 mg/kg
  • Time-trial performance (cycling)
  • +6.2% (p < 0.05)
  • Trained cyclists
  • Optimal dose-timing combination for endurance performance in trained populations
  • 0.5 mg/kg
  • 120 minutes
  • Post-exercise CK and recovery time
  • −31% CK, −18% recovery time
  • Resistance-trained athletes
  • Maximal protective effect on muscle damage markers. No additional benefit above this dose
  • 0.75 mg/kg
  • Peak power output
  • No change from baseline
  • Mixed training status
  • Dose exceeds cardiolipin binding capacity. Excess peptide cleared without additional effect
  • 1.0 mg/kg
  • All performance metrics
  • No improvement over 0.5 mg/kg
  • Trained endurance athletes
  • Saturation reached at lower doses. Higher doses increase cost without increasing benefit
More references

Related material