Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

TB-500 Hair Growth Research — Comparison of Evidence Quality

Murine dermal wound healing C57BL/6 mice (n=24) Re-epithelialization rate at day 7 85% closure (TB-500) vs 58% (control) Demonstrates wound repair efficacy. Not follicular cycling Rat whisker follicle regrowth Sprague-Dawley rats (n=16) Telogen duration post-p

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Murine dermal wound healing
  • C57BL/6 mice (n=24)
  • Re-epithelialization rate at day 7
  • 85% closure (TB-500) vs 58% (control)
  • Demonstrates wound repair efficacy. Not follicular cycling
  • Rat whisker follicle regrowth
  • Sprague-Dawley rats (n=16)
  • Telogen duration post-plucking
  • 15% reduction in telogen phase
  • Whisker follicles regenerate robustly under baseline conditions. Poor model for human androgenic alopecia
  • Human androgenic alopecia trials
  • None published
  • N/A
  • Zero controlled trials exist. All claims are extrapolation
  • Human alopecia areata trials
  • No immune-modulation data in autoimmune hair loss
  • Equine tendon injury (veterinary)
  • Standardbred horses (n=42)
  • Ultrasonographic lesion size reduction
  • Significant improvement vs placebo (p<0.05)
  • Validates TB-500 for soft tissue repair. Unrelated to follicular biology
More references

Related material