Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

TB-500 Support Injury Prevention Research: Type Comparison

Equine tendon repair Post-injury (induced lesions) Tensile strength recovery at 12 weeks 28% improvement vs control Strong evidence. Actin pathways activated by damage Rodent dermal wound closure Post-injury (full-thickness excision) Days to complete re-epithe

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Equine tendon repair
  • Post-injury (induced lesions)
  • Tensile strength recovery at 12 weeks
  • 28% improvement vs control
  • Strong evidence. Actin pathways activated by damage
  • Rodent dermal wound closure
  • Post-injury (full-thickness excision)
  • Days to complete re-epithelialization
  • 40–60% faster closure
  • Consistent across multiple labs. Reproducible
  • Equine prophylactic administration
  • Pre-injury (intact tendons)
  • Injury incidence during exercise stress
  • No significant difference vs placebo
  • Prevention hypothesis unsupported
  • Human Achilles tendinopathy case series
  • Chronic injury (existing damage)
  • Pain reduction + ultrasound markers
  • Modest improvement. No control group
  • Suggestive but uncontrolled. High bias risk
  • Human Phase I safety (Tβ4, not TB-500)
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Safety + exploratory cardiac function
  • Well tolerated. Functional data inconclusive
  • Safety established. Efficacy not demonstrated
More references

Related material