Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Tesamorelin + Ipamorelin Blend: Dosing Comparison by Protocol Type

Standard 40s Protocol 300mcg 200mcg Once daily (pre-bed) 5 days on, 2 days off Visceral fat reduction, IGF-1 normalisation Optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability for age group. Lower tesamorelin dose prevents joint issues while ipamorelin maintains GH pu

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Standard 40s Protocol
  • 300mcg
  • 200mcg
  • Once daily (pre-bed)
  • 5 days on, 2 days off
  • Visceral fat reduction, IGF-1 normalisation
  • Optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability for age group. Lower tesamorelin dose prevents joint issues while ipamorelin maintains GH pulse amplitude
  • High-Dose Monotherapy
  • 1–2mg
  • 0mcg
  • Once daily
  • Continuous
  • Maximum visceral fat reduction
  • Higher side effect burden (joint stiffness, oedema) with marginal additional fat loss. Hepatic IGF-1 conversion saturates beyond 500mcg in 40+ demographic
  • Ipamorelin-Only Protocol
  • 300–500mcg
  • 2–3x daily
  • General GH restoration
  • Misses tesamorelin's targeted visceral adipose receptor action. Effective for muscle preservation but weaker visceral fat mobilisation in metabolically resistant tissue
  • Pulse-Focused Protocol
  • Twice daily (morning + pre-bed)
  • Maximum IGF-1 elevation
  • More complex dosing with limited additional benefit. Single pre-bed dose captures nocturnal GH peak when lipolytic conditions are optimal
More references

Related material