Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Tesamorelin + Ipamorelin Blend: Protocol Comparison

Aggressive VAT Reduction 2mg daily 200mcg once daily Once daily (morning) 12–18% visceral fat reduction over 12–16 weeks; moderate muscle preservation Best for individuals with significant visceral adiposity (VAT >130cm² on imaging); requires protein intake ≥1

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Aggressive VAT Reduction
  • 2mg daily
  • 200mcg once daily
  • Once daily (morning)
  • 12–18% visceral fat reduction over 12–16 weeks; moderate muscle preservation
  • Best for individuals with significant visceral adiposity (VAT >130cm² on imaging); requires protein intake ≥1.8g/kg to prevent muscle loss
  • Balanced Recomposition
  • 1.5mg daily
  • 250mcg twice daily
  • Twice daily (morning + pre-sleep)
  • 8–12% VAT reduction with lean mass preservation or 1–3% gain
  • Optimal for moderate body fat (15–25%) seeking simultaneous fat loss and muscle retention; supports natural GH pulse pattern
  • Lean Gain Emphasis
  • 1mg daily
  • 300mcg twice daily
  • Twice daily (post-workout + pre-sleep)
  • Modest VAT reduction (5–8%) with 2–4% lean mass gain
  • Effective during controlled caloric surplus; ipamorelin's anabolic signaling dominates; best paired with resistance training
  • Maintenance / Plateau Break
  • 1mg EOD
  • 3–4× weekly
  • Prevents metabolic adaptation during extended deficits; 3–5% further VAT reduction
  • Used after initial recomposition phase to sustain results without continuous daily dosing; reduces peptide cost and receptor sensitivity risk
More references

Related material