Source comparison
Tesamorelin + Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin
Both are GHRH + GHRP blends. Core differences: GHRH half-life ~25 min ~30 min Strongest human evidence Visceral fat (FDA-studied) None specific (community use) Dosing cadence Daily PM Daily AM/PM or 2-3x daily Off-label fit Body recomposition, stubborn abdomin
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- Both are GHRH + GHRP blends. Core differences:
- GHRH half-life
- ~25 min
- ~30 min
- Strongest human evidence
- Visceral fat (FDA-studied)
- None specific (community use)
- Dosing cadence
- Daily PM
- Daily AM/PM or 2-3x daily
- Off-label fit
- Body recomposition, stubborn abdominal fat
- Anti-aging, sleep, recovery
- Typical blend
- 10mg / 3mg
- 5mg / 5mg
- Cost per mg
- Higher (tesamorelin is pricier)
- Lower
- For visceral fat specifically, tesamorelin has the strongest case. For general anti-aging, CJC-1295 is the more-used pick. See the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin dosing guide for the other half of this comparison.