Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Tesamorelin vs HIV Lipodystrophy: Clinical Response Comparison

Tesamorelin 2mg daily −15.2% (−1,084g trunk fat) −2.0 cm Minimal (+4.3 mg/dL fasting glucose, stable HbA1c) VAT rebounds ~40% within 12 weeks Most effective pharmacological option for visceral fat; requires ongoing therapy Diet + Exercise (structured) −3–7% (H

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Tesamorelin 2mg daily
  • −15.2% (−1,084g trunk fat)
  • −2.0 cm
  • Minimal (+4.3 mg/dL fasting glucose, stable HbA1c)
  • VAT rebounds ~40% within 12 weeks
  • Most effective pharmacological option for visceral fat; requires ongoing therapy
  • Diet + Exercise (structured)
  • −3–7% (HIV lipodystrophy cohorts)
  • −0.5 to −1.2 cm
  • No adverse effect
  • Sustained if adherence maintained
  • First-line but rarely sufficient alone in established lipodystrophy
  • Exogenous GH (off-label)
  • −10–12%
  • −1.5 to −2.5 cm
  • Significant (elevated fasting glucose, insulin resistance)
  • VAT rebounds rapidly
  • Higher metabolic risk; not FDA-approved for this indication
  • Liposuction (surgical)
  • N/A (removes tissue directly)
  • Variable (−3 to −6 cm)
  • None
  • Permanent removal but no metabolic correction
  • Addresses cosmetic concern but doesn't reverse metabolic dysfunction
More references

Related material