Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Thymosin Alpha-1 Cancer Immunotherapy Adjunct: Clinical Response Comparison

The table below compares objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune biomarker changes across published trials using thymosin alpha-1 cancer immunotherapy adjunct versus monotherapy controls. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) 18% (

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • The table below compares objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune biomarker changes across published trials using thymosin alpha-1 cancer immunotherapy adjunct versus monotherapy controls.
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
  • 18% (sorafenib)
  • 31% (sorafenib + Tα1)
  • +4.7 months
  • CD8+ TILs increased 2.1-fold
  • Strongest adjunct benefit in HCC—thymosin alpha-1 reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression
  • NSCLC (PD-L1 1–49%)
  • 28% (pembrolizumab)
  • 41% (pembrolizumab + Tα1)
  • +3.5 months
  • PD-1+ T cells increased 38%
  • Significant benefit in low-PD-L1 tumors where checkpoint monotherapy underperforms
  • Melanoma (Stage III/IV)
  • 52% 12-mo OS (ipilimumab)
  • 68% 12-mo OS (ipilimumab + Tα1)
  • +2.8 months
  • IFN-γ production increased 1.9-fold
  • Improved survival without increased irAEs—viable intensification strategy
  • Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
  • 22% 6-mo PFS (gemcitabine)
  • 38% 6-mo PFS (gemcitabine + Tα1)
  • +1.4 months
  • MDSC frequency reduced 42%
  • Preliminary evidence in cold tumors—mechanism differs from checkpoint-sensitive cancers
More references

Related material