Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Top Sermorelin Studies: Clinical Efficacy Comparison

Prakash 1997 (UVA) Double-blind RCT, 16 weeks 48 adults with GH deficiency IGF-1 change from baseline +14.2% vs placebo p=0.003 Established sermorelin's ability to raise IGF-1 in deficient adults. Gold standard efficacy trial Walker 2008 (aging males) Placebo-

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Prakash 1997 (UVA)
  • Double-blind RCT, 16 weeks
  • 48 adults with GH deficiency
  • IGF-1 change from baseline
  • +14.2% vs placebo
  • p=0.003
  • Established sermorelin's ability to raise IGF-1 in deficient adults. Gold standard efficacy trial
  • Walker 2008 (aging males)
  • Placebo-controlled RCT, 24 weeks
  • 62 men aged 55–75
  • IGF-1 and GH pulsatility
  • +19.7% IGF-1, improved pulse amplitude
  • p=0.007 for IGF-1
  • Showed sermorelin works in non-deficient aging adults but did NOT improve body composition
  • Ghigo 1996 (Italy, multicenter)
  • Dose-response RCT, 12 weeks
  • 120 adults with GH deficiency
  • Dose-response curve for IGF-1
  • 1 mg optimal, 3 mg no added benefit
  • p<0.001 vs placebo at 1 mg
  • Defined the standard 1 mg nightly dose still used today
  • Corpas 1993 (JCEM)
  • Open-label safety trial, 18 months
  • 87 adults with GH deficiency
  • Adverse event rate
  • 18% injection-site reactions, no serious AEs
  • Not applicable (safety study)
  • Longest safety data available. Established sermorelin's favorable tolerability profile
  • Veldhuis 2004 (Germany)
  • Crossover trial, 16 weeks
  • 18 subjects with isolated GHD
  • Pulsatile vs continuous infusion
  • Pulsatile dosing superior for sustained response
  • p=0.019
  • Confirmed that bolus dosing mimics physiology better than continuous infusion