Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Best Peptides for Strength: Research-Grade Options Comparison

GHRP-2 + CJC-1295 (no-DAC) Pulsatile GH release via dual-axis stimulation (ghrelin + GHRH pathways) Direct. IGF-1 upregulation drives satellite cell activation and myofibrillar protein synthesis 100–200mcg GHRP-2 + 100mcg CJC-1295, 2–3x daily Subcutaneous inje

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • GHRP-2 + CJC-1295 (no-DAC)
  • Pulsatile GH release via dual-axis stimulation (ghrelin + GHRH pathways)
  • Direct. IGF-1 upregulation drives satellite cell activation and myofibrillar protein synthesis
  • 100–200mcg GHRP-2 + 100mcg CJC-1295, 2–3x daily
  • Subcutaneous injection
  • Gold standard for strength research. Strongest evidence for contractile protein enhancement and motor unit recruitment gains
  • MK-677 (Ibutamoren)
  • Sustained GH/IGF-1 elevation via ghrelin receptor agonism
  • Indirect. Hypertrophy-driven strength, secondary to lean mass accrual
  • 10–25mg once daily
  • Oral capsule or solution
  • Best for long-duration protocols where compliance matters. Strength gains lag hypertrophy by 4–6 weeks
  • Hexarelin
  • Pulsatile GH release, cardioprotective effects via ghrelin pathway
  • Direct. Similar to GHRP-2 but with additional cardiac muscle contractility benefits
  • 100–200mcg 2–3x daily
  • Underutilized in pure strength research. Cardiac benefits make it valuable for endurance-strength hybrid studies
  • SLU-PP-332
  • ERRγ agonism. Increases mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative capacity
  • Direct. Force output improvement independent of hypertrophy, mediated by ATP production per contraction
  • 10–20mg daily (preclinical models)
  • Oral or subcutaneous (formulation-dependent)
  • Emerging compound with strongest data for strength-to-weight optimization. Limited human trial data as of 2026
  • Follistatin-based peptides
  • Myostatin inhibition. Removes negative regulation on muscle growth
  • Indirect. Hypertrophy ceiling raised, allowing supraphysiological muscle mass accrual
  • Protocol-dependent (ACE-031 trials used 1–3mg/kg)
  • Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection
  • High theoretical potential, limited by safety concerns in past trials. Strength gains are downstream of mass increases
  • Cerebrolysin
  • Neurotrophic signaling. Enhances synaptic plasticity and motor unit recruitment
  • Indirect. Improved neuromuscular coordination and force transmission efficiency
  • 5–30mL daily (clinical doses for neurological conditions)
  • Intramuscular or intravenous injection
  • Niche application for strength. Most valuable when neural adaptation is the limiting factor, not muscle size
More references

Related material