Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

CJC-1295 No DAC + Ipamorelin: Protocol Comparison

Single Evening Dose 100–200 mcg 200–300 mcg 30–60 min pre-sleep 2.8–4.2× baseline Captures largest nocturnal GH pulse. Simplest and most effective for most research applications Twice-Daily Split 100 mcg 150–200 mcg Morning (fasted) + evening pre-sleep 2.2–3.8

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Single Evening Dose
  • 100–200 mcg
  • 200–300 mcg
  • 30–60 min pre-sleep
  • 2.8–4.2× baseline
  • Captures largest nocturnal GH pulse. Simplest and most effective for most research applications
  • Twice-Daily Split
  • 100 mcg
  • 150–200 mcg
  • Morning (fasted) + evening pre-sleep
  • 2.2–3.8× baseline per dose
  • Targets both major pulse windows but requires early morning administration (4–6 AM). Impractical outside controlled settings
  • Random Daytime Dosing
  • Variable (no circadian alignment)
  • 1.5–2.1× baseline
  • Fights elevated somatostatin tone throughout the day. Significantly reduced efficacy compared to timed protocols
  • CJC-1295 No DAC Alone
  • 200 mcg
  • N/A
  • Evening pre-sleep
  • 1.8–2.4× baseline
  • Single-pathway GHRH stimulation. Misses ghrelin receptor synergy that doubles pulse amplitude
  • Ipamorelin Alone
  • 300 mcg
  • 1.6–2.2× baseline
  • Single-pathway ghrelin receptor stimulation. Misses GHRH-mediated cAMP amplification that sustains pulse duration
More references

Related material