Source comparison
CJC-1295 No DAC & Ipamorelin: Protocol Comparison
Standard Synergy 150mcg 250mcg 3×/week (M/W/F) General GH pulse optimisation without daily commitment Ideal starting point. Preserves receptor sensitivity while delivering measurable synergy. Best for researchers new to peptide protocols. Intensive Loading 200
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- Standard Synergy
- 150mcg
- 250mcg
- 3×/week (M/W/F)
- General GH pulse optimisation without daily commitment
- Ideal starting point. Preserves receptor sensitivity while delivering measurable synergy. Best for researchers new to peptide protocols.
- Intensive Loading
- 200mcg
- 300mcg
- 5×/week (5 days on, 2 off)
- Short-term studies requiring maximal GH output over 4–6 weeks
- Effective but requires disciplined cycling. Receptor fatigue sets in after 6 weeks without a washout. Don't extend this protocol beyond that window.
- Twice-Daily Pulse
- 100mcg
- 2×/day (AM + PM) for 5 days, then 2 days off
- Mimicking natural diurnal GH rhythm in controlled studies
- Highest fidelity to natural secretion patterns. Logistically demanding and offers marginal benefit over 3×/week for most research endpoints.
- Maintenance Protocol
- 2×/week (e.g., Tuesday/Saturday)
- Long-term studies beyond 12 weeks
- Lower synergy ceiling but sustainable indefinitely. Use this after completing an intensive phase to maintain baseline improvements without desensitisation risk.