Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Comparison: IGF-1 LR3 vs Endogenous IGF-1 vs Growth Hormone

Half-Life 12–15 hours (bound to IGFBPs) 20–30 hours (evades IGFBPs) 2–4 hours (pulsatile release) IGF-1 LR3's extended half-life removes natural regulatory feedback Receptor Specificity Primarily IGF-1R, regulated by IGFBPs IGF-1R with minimal IGFBP interferen

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Half-Life
  • 12–15 hours (bound to IGFBPs)
  • 20–30 hours (evades IGFBPs)
  • 2–4 hours (pulsatile release)
  • IGF-1 LR3's extended half-life removes natural regulatory feedback
  • Receptor Specificity
  • Primarily IGF-1R, regulated by IGFBPs
  • IGF-1R with minimal IGFBP interference
  • Indirect via hepatic IGF-1 synthesis
  • Direct receptor agonism bypasses growth hormone's hepatic control
  • Tissue Selectivity
  • Controlled by local IGFBP expression
  • Systemic. All IGF-1R-expressing tissues
  • Broad metabolic effects beyond IGF-1
  • Lack of tissue selectivity raises multi-organ risk
  • Long-Term Human Data
  • Decades of observational studies
  • None beyond 8–12 weeks
  • FDA-approved for specific deficiencies with monitoring
  • Absence of long-term human trials is the critical gap
  • Hypoglycaemia Risk
  • Low (physiologic regulation)
  • Moderate to high (dose-dependent)
  • Low (indirect glucose effects)
  • Acute hypoglycaemia is documented. Chronic glucose dysregulation is plausible
  • Tumour Promotion Concern
  • Elevated endogenous levels correlate with increased cancer risk in some cohorts
  • Theoretical amplification due to sustained receptor activation
  • Similar concerns with supraphysiological dosing
  • Mechanism suggests risk. Epidemiological data in humans does not exist
More references

Related material