Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Comparison Table: GHRH Analog Research Compounds

Sermorelin GHRH(1-29) ~20-30 min Pulsatile, physiological Aging GH axis; receptor sensitivity studies Link CJC-1295 (no DAC) GHRH(1-29) modified ~30 min to 2 hr Pulsatile, extended DPP-IV resistant studies; moderate duration CJC-1295 (DAC) GHRH(1-29)+DAC ~6-8

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Sermorelin
  • GHRH(1-29)
  • ~20-30 min
  • Pulsatile, physiological
  • Aging GH axis; receptor sensitivity studies
  • Link
  • CJC-1295 (no DAC)
  • GHRH(1-29) modified
  • ~30 min to 2 hr
  • Pulsatile, extended
  • DPP-IV resistant studies; moderate duration
  • CJC-1295 (DAC)
  • GHRH(1-29)+DAC
  • ~6-8 days
  • Sustained
  • Maximal GH elevation; body composition
  • Tesamorelin
  • GHRH(1-44) trans-3-hex
  • ~25-38 min
  • Pulsatile-sustained
  • Visceral fat; GH pulse dynamics
  • Ipamorelin (reference)
  • Synthetic pentapeptide
  • ~2 hr
  • Pulsatile via GHSR
  • GHRH-independent GH; synergy stack
  • All compounds for research use only.
More references

Related material

Comparison

Route Comparison Summary

Intravenous (IV) 100% Immediate PK studies, acute GH response studies Subcutaneous (SC) ~40-70% 5-10 minutes Standard animal model studies Intranasal Low Variable Delivery route c…

View details →