Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

MOTS-c Dosage Protocols: Frequency vs Magnitude Comparison

5mg 3x/week 15mg 23% (USC study) Consistent pulsatile. Peaks every 48–72 hours High. Fits MWF schedule Optimal for most users. Balances efficacy and convenience 10mg 2x/week 20mg 19% (USC study) Moderate pulsatile. 72–96 hour gaps Moderate. Requires precise sp

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • 5mg 3x/week
  • 15mg
  • 23% (USC study)
  • Consistent pulsatile. Peaks every 48–72 hours
  • High. Fits MWF schedule
  • Optimal for most users. Balances efficacy and convenience
  • 10mg 2x/week
  • 20mg
  • 19% (USC study)
  • Moderate pulsatile. 72–96 hour gaps
  • Moderate. Requires precise spacing
  • Good for restoration protocols or higher body weight
  • 15mg 1x/week
  • 14% (USC study)
  • Single peak, 6-day trough
  • Very high. Once weekly
  • Suboptimal. Long gaps allow AMPK signaling to fully return to baseline
  • 2.5mg daily
  • 17.5mg
  • Not clinically tested in humans
  • Near-constant activation
  • Low. Daily injections impractical
  • Theoretically ideal but impractical outside research settings
  • 7.5mg 2x/week
  • Estimated 17–20% (interpolated)
  • Moderate pulsatile
  • High. Twice weekly dosing sustainable
  • Strong middle-ground option for metabolically healthy users
More references

Related material

Comparison

Comparison with Other Forms

While subcutaneous administration is the standard, alternate forms such as oral or topical are less common due to lower bioavailability and efficacy. Subcutaneous injections ensur…

View details →