Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

NAD+ Dosage Comparison by Form and Frequency

IV NAD+ 250–1000mg per session Weekly or twice weekly 30–60 minutes 100% (direct infusion) Highest peak concentration but shortest duration. Best for acute interventions or weekly maintenance; impractical for daily use due to cost and access Sublingual NAD+ 25

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • IV NAD+
  • 250–1000mg per session
  • Weekly or twice weekly
  • 30–60 minutes
  • 100% (direct infusion)
  • Highest peak concentration but shortest duration. Best for acute interventions or weekly maintenance; impractical for daily use due to cost and access
  • Sublingual NAD+
  • 250–500mg
  • Daily
  • 60–90 minutes
  • 40–60% (bypasses first-pass)
  • Balanced approach for sustained elevation. Lower peaks than IV but consistent daily availability; practical for long-term protocols
  • Oral NAD+
  • 1000mg+
  • Not applicable (mostly degraded)
  • <10% (gut/liver degradation)
  • Least efficient route. Requires very high doses to achieve minimal systemic NAD+; better served by precursor forms
  • NMN (precursor)
  • 300–1000mg
  • Daily (single or split dose)
  • N/A (converts intracellularly)
  • 60–80% (direct cellular uptake)
  • Most studied precursor. Efficient intracellular conversion with lower side-effect profile than direct NAD+; dose-response plateaus around 1000mg
  • NR (precursor)
  • 50–70% (requires phosphorylation)
  • Effective alternative to NMN. Slightly lower conversion efficiency but well-tolerated; similar dose ceiling around 1000mg daily
  • Liposomal NAD+
  • 90–120 minutes (extended by liposome)
  • 30–50% (lipid encapsulation)
  • Improved oral bioavailability over standard oral forms but still inferior to sublingual or IV; best used when other routes are unavailable
More references

Related material