Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Peptides for Bodybuilding: Comparison of Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence

GHRP-6 Ghrelin receptor agonist → pulsatile GH release IGF-1 increase 60–90%, modest LBM gain 100–300mcg 2–3x daily Increased appetite, transient cortisol spike Effective for GH optimization; appetite surge limits cut-phase use Ipamorelin Selective GHS-R1a ago

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • GHRP-6
  • Ghrelin receptor agonist → pulsatile GH release
  • IGF-1 increase 60–90%, modest LBM gain
  • 100–300mcg 2–3x daily
  • Increased appetite, transient cortisol spike
  • Effective for GH optimization; appetite surge limits cut-phase use
  • Ipamorelin
  • Selective GHS-R1a agonist → GH pulse without ghrelin effects
  • GH secretion +200–400% vs baseline
  • 200–300mcg 2–3x daily
  • Minimal; occasional injection site reaction
  • Cleanest GH secretagogue for lean mass retention
  • MK 677
  • Oral GH secretagogue; 24-hour half-life
  • LBM +1.1kg over 12 weeks (clinical trial)
  • 12.5–25mg once daily
  • Insulin resistance risk >12 weeks, water retention
  • Oral convenience; requires glucose monitoring long-term
  • BPC-157
  • Angiogenesis + growth factor upregulation at injury sites
  • 60% faster tendon healing in preclinical models
  • 250–500mcg 2x daily
  • Minimal documented side effects
  • Strong preclinical evidence; no human RCTs yet
  • TB-500
  • Actin polymerization + cell migration to damaged tissue
  • Accelerated soft tissue repair in animal models
  • 2mg 2x weekly (loading), 2mg weekly (maintenance)
  • Rare; occasional fatigue
  • Mechanistically distinct from BPC-157; stacks well
  • Follistatin-344
  • Myostatin inhibitor → removes growth ceiling
  • +25% muscle mass in gene therapy models (mice)
  • 100–300mcg daily (no human dosing standard)
  • Unknown; theoretical cardiac risk
  • High potential, low human data; dosing precision critical
More references

Related material

Comparison

Peptides vs SARMs

Peptides are going to be more effective in the long run, with potentially more side effects. SARMs could yield faster results, but probably not as strong. SARMs also have the disa…

View details →
Comparison

Research Peptides vs Supplements

Research Peptides are probably a step up from everyday supplements, such as protein powder, or even collagen proteins. Research Peptides are not FDA approved, yet, but they seem t…

View details →
Comparison

Research Peptides vs Steroids

While Anabolic Steroids are still used as therapeutics by some doctors, they are wildly different from Peptides. Steroid molecules will bind to the androgen receptors in the body,…

View details →
Comparison

Research Peptides vs SARMs

SARMs are Steroids 2.0 essentially. They were designed to replace Steroids in the medical world, and also differ wildly from Peptides. They do not bind at the same site in the hum…

View details →