Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Telehealth Clinicians Tesamorelin Protocol: Treatment Comparison

Starting Dose 2 mg SC daily 1 mg SC daily 2 mg SC 5 days/week Standard protocol delivers 12–18% VAT reduction in responders; maintenance prevents rebound; cycling addresses desensitization IGF-1 Monitoring Baseline, weeks 8/16/24 Every 12 weeks Baseline, weeks

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • Starting Dose
  • 2 mg SC daily
  • 1 mg SC daily
  • 2 mg SC 5 days/week
  • Standard protocol delivers 12–18% VAT reduction in responders; maintenance prevents rebound; cycling addresses desensitization
  • IGF-1 Monitoring
  • Baseline, weeks 8/16/24
  • Every 12 weeks
  • Baseline, weeks 8/20
  • Monitoring frequency must match dose intensity. Maintenance requires less frequent checks
  • Glucose Monitoring
  • Fasting glucose at weeks 4/8/12/16
  • HbA1c every 6 months
  • Fasting glucose at weeks 4/12/20
  • Glucose dysregulation risk scales with dose and IGF-1 elevation. Tighter monitoring at higher doses
  • VAT Reduction Target
  • 15–20% from baseline
  • Prevent rebound (maintain reduction)
  • 18–22% (higher ceiling due to cycling)
  • Cycling may push past standard plateau if initiated at week 16–20
  • Duration
  • 26 weeks, then reassess
  • Ongoing (patients typically continue 12–24 months)
  • 26–40 weeks
  • Longer durations require cost-benefit analysis. VAT reduction plateaus but doesn't reverse while on therapy
  • Adverse Event Rate
  • Injection site reactions 35%, arthralgia 15%
  • Lower (10–12% joint pain at 1 mg)
  • Similar to standard protocol
  • Dose reduction at maintenance significantly lowers AE burden without full VAT rebound
More references

Related material