Skip to content
Recovery & Performance PeptidesRecovery research and practical context
Source comparison

Best NAD+ Dosage for DNA Repair: Form Comparison

NMN (oral) 250–500mg daily Moderate (15–30% systemic) 30–60 minutes 8-OHdG reduced 18–25%, gamma-H2AX foci reduced 20–34% in split-dose trials Most studied precursor with consistent human trial data; split dosing required for circadian alignment NR (oral) 300–

This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.

  • NMN (oral)
  • 250–500mg daily
  • Moderate (15–30% systemic)
  • 30–60 minutes
  • 8-OHdG reduced 18–25%, gamma-H2AX foci reduced 20–34% in split-dose trials
  • Most studied precursor with consistent human trial data; split dosing required for circadian alignment
  • NR (oral)
  • 300–600mg daily
  • Moderate (20–35% systemic)
  • 45–90 minutes
  • Similar to NMN in head-to-head trials; 8-OHdG reduced 15–22%
  • Slightly higher first-pass stability than NMN but requires conversion through NMN intermediate. No clear advantage
  • NAD+ IV infusion
  • 250–500mg per session
  • High (near 100%)
  • Immediate
  • Acute elevation in PARP activity within 2 hours; sustained effects require weekly administration
  • Fastest plasma elevation but impractical for daily use; best for acute intervention or clinical settings
  • Liposomal NAD+
  • 100–250mg daily
  • Moderate-High (40–60% estimated)
  • 20–40 minutes
  • Limited published data; anecdotal reports suggest efficacy between oral NMN and IV
  • Emerging delivery method; phospholipid encapsulation bypasses some gut degradation but lacks long-term trial data
  • Sublingual NMN
  • 125–250mg daily
  • Moderate-High (30–50% estimated)
  • 15–30 minutes
  • Comparable to oral NMN in small trials; buccal absorption avoids hepatic first-pass
  • Faster peak but shorter half-life; may require more frequent dosing than oral
More references

Related material